Cupra Born review
More adventurous styling and a better-quality interior help set the Spanish brand's first electric car apart from the Volkswagen ID.3 it's based on
Pros
- Looks great
- Decent ride and handling
- Better interior than VW ID.3
Cons
- No 4WD version offered yet
- Only slightly quicker than ID.3
- Some rivals offer faster charging
| Battery/motor | Range | Wallbox charge time | Rapid charge time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45kWh/148bhp | 211 miles | 7hrs 30mins (0-100%, 7.4kW) | 26mins (10-80%, 100kW) |
| 58kWh/201bhp | 264 miles | 9hrs 15mins (0-100%, 7.4kW) | 35mins (5-80%, 125kW) |
| 58kWh/228bhp | 261 miles | 9hrs 15mins (0-100%, 7.4kW) | 35mins (5-80%, 125kW) |
| 77kWh/228bhp | 340 miles | 12hrs 15mins (0-100%, 7.4kW) | 36mins (5-80%, 135kW) |
The Cupra name isn’t new, although it only recently became a standalone brand within the Volkswagen Group. Formerly a badge applied to hotted-up SEATs, the sub-brand was split from its parent company and now offers a range of cars. But the Cupra Born is unlike anything the Spanish outfit has released to date, because it’s fully electric.
The first time we drove Born was in Spain, where we filmed our video review (above), but we have also taken the zero-emissions family hatchback out on some UK roads. Our test car featured a 58kWh battery and single electric motor producing 201bhp and 310Nm of torque; enough for 0-62mph in a respectable 7.3 seconds and a range of 264 miles.
This is the first of four Born variants that'll be available in time, including one capable of up to 340 miles on a charge. We also expect a more potent variant to arrive later down the road – Cupra’s equivalent of the upcoming Volkswagen ID.3 GTX hot hatchback.
The Born shares underpinnings with the ID.3, which we’re very familiar with at this stage, as well as the ID.4, ID.5, Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq iV. The challenge for Cupra, then, was to make the Born different enough from those cars for it to have a distinct appeal to certain buyers. The first element of this is styling, where a sculpted bonnet, sharp LED headlights and eye-catching wheels have been employed to make the Born look sportier and more aggressive than the smoothed-off, non-threatening Volkswagen.
Interior quality is very good, too. This is one area where the ID.3 has come in for criticism – and one area where the Cupra registers a definite improvement over its sibling. It looks and feels nicer than the rather austere VW, and it even has a better thought-out infotainment layout, though the systems in rivals like the Renault Megane E-TECH Electric and Kia Niro EV are better still.
A higher centre console means the Cupra doesn’t feel as roomy as the VW, but the trade-off is a more driver-focused feel – which ties in nicely with its sporty appearance, with the driver and front passenger getting supportive sports bucket seats. On the downside, however, the Cupra persists with the annoying touch-sensitive sliders on the dashboard and steering wheel that cause so much frustration in the VW.
On the road, the Born offers refinement, solid handling and good ride comfort in most situations, even on our test car’s chunky 20-inch alloys. There’s also decent body control and grip is good. Acceleration can tail off after the initial sprint from 0-30mph, but power delivery is smooth and predictable – unlike the whiplash-inducing surges some sporty EVs offer.
Right now, the entry-level Born and the equivalent ID.3 (the only version currently on sale) are pretty evenly matched when it comes to pricing, but you get a sharper-looking car with a more attractive and better-quality interior for your money with the Cupra. The Born also manages to offer a subtly different driving experience to the ID.3, although we’d have appreciated even driver involvement from this particular brand’s first electric offering. For a more detailed look at the Cupra Born, read on for the rest of our in-depth review…
