BMW 330e vs Volvo S60 T8: performance and handling

The Volvo is the outright faster car, but the rear-drive BMW is more satisfying from behind the wheel

BMW 330e vs Volvo S60 T8

The BMW falls short of the Volvo in terms of its performance. The 330e gets a 2.0-litre turbocharged petrol engine that, combined with a 111bhp electric motor, sends 245bhp to the rear wheels. Toggle the drive mode button to Sport and a subdued ‘XtraBoost’ icon appears that means you’re getting the full potential of the combined petrol and electric power sources, which ups the available shove to 288bhp and fires the 330e from 0-62mph in 5.9 seconds with a rorty rasp from the exhaust.

The Volvo S60 T8 has far beefier performance. Our test car came with the £745 Polestar Engineered pack, which ups power to 395bhp in total, although the electric range and efficiency aren't affected by this option, as the electric motor retains its 86bhp output. 

Suffice to say, when you select the Polestar option using the rather chintzy rotary switch in front of the gear selector and mash the accelerator. The Volvo launches up the road with a brief scrabble of tyres and a muted growl, whistle and whoosh from the characterful engine. It has a delightful sense of being seriously naughty, but always in a polite way, even as it punches to 62mph from rest in 4.4 seconds. 

Having said that, in real-world use the BMW never feels far behind the Volvo. It has a real edge to its power delivery and point-to-point pace that leaves you in no doubt of its sports-car potential, helped by the super-slick eight-speed automatic gearbox. 

The BMW’s handling, similarly, has a real texture and depth of connection that’s lacking in the lighter steering of the Volvo. We’re not talking about a whisper of entertainment if you razz down a country road, here; the BMW’s poise and general sense of involvement is a tangible benefit over the lighter, less connected-feeling Volvo whether you’re muddling through Milton Keynes on a Tuesday afternoon or threading down a decent open road. If the four-wheel drive Volvo’s fluid yet stoic all-weather appropriateness is more to your taste, it’s worth knowing that the 330e will shortly be available with four-wheel drive, too. 

Comfort is no issue in either car. Both our test cars rode on standard suspension, and while there’s a touch more wheel-bounce and thumping over potholes in the S60, both are admirably cosseting. Refinement in the two is so close as to be almost inseparable. Both managed 51dB in electric mode at 30mph, or 59dB with the petrol engine going. The Volvo kicks up a fraction more tyre noise, returning 70dB compared to the BMW’s 69dB a 70mph with the petrol engines fired up, but both make for exemplary long-distance transport.

Most Popular

Polestar 2 now with 395-mile range and faster charging
Polestar 2 updated
News

Polestar 2 now with 395-mile range and faster charging

The Tesla Model 3 rival gets major updates for the 2024 model year; order books open now, with prices starting from £44,950
24 Jan 2023
New Peugeot e-3008 electric SUV to offer 435-mile range
Peugeot e-3008 teaser
News

New Peugeot e-3008 electric SUV to offer 435-mile range

Peugeot’s first bespoke EV will be available with all-wheel drive and is due to be revealed later this year
26 Jan 2023
First look at new Ford electric SUV ahead of 2023 reveal
Ford medium-sized crossover prototype
News

First look at new Ford electric SUV ahead of 2023 reveal

The as-yet-unnamed EV is expected to debut in March and will be built on the same platform as the Volkswagen ID.4 SUV
23 Jan 2023